RUSSIA & AMERICA GOODWILL ASSOCIATION
Russia & America Goodwill Association
  • Home
  • Русский
    • НОВОСТИ
    • СЕРЬЕЗНЫЕ АНАЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ СТАТЬИ
    • КНИГИ
    • РЕСУРСЫ
    • О НАС
    • ПАРТНЕРЫ
    • КОНТАКТЫ
  • News
    • SERIOUS ANALYTICAL ARTICLES
  • FORUM
  • Books
  • Resources
  • About Us
    • Team
    • Partners
  • Contact

Andrei Kozyrev in The New York Times: On treason, defections and other ancient Russian traditions

8/26/2015

0 Comments

 
PictureGilbert Doctorow, Ph.D.
“He became a traitor not because he was forced into it but of his own free will. While still in Muscovy he did not wish the state well but left his country for the enemy and fought against the Orthodox lands, and having become a traitor he wrote a rude letter to the Sovereign.” Russian ambassador to Poland, April 1581, denouncing Prince Andrei Kurbsky

 by 
Gilbert Doctorow, Ph.D.

Over the past month, the chattering classes in Moscow have had some saucy news to digest, much of it about the bizarre career choice of Maria Gaidar.  Masha, as she is generally known, is a third generation member of Kremlin elites best known as the daughter of the reforming prime minister of President Boris Yeltsin whose neo-liberal economic policies broke up what remained of the Soviet command economy without succeeding in replacing it with a functional market economy. The net result of her father’s work was to give Liberal politicians and democracy promotion a bad name in Russia for at least a generation. Notwithstanding that legacy of her father, in public life, Masha Gaidar has been a torch-bearer of the Liberal Opposition to the Putin ‘regime.’

In mid-July, Gaidar left behind her NGO in Moscow for a new job in Ukraine as deputy governor of the Odessa region, where her immediate boss is the Kremlin’s arch-enemy Mikhel Saakashvili. That breaking news was followed shortly by the revelation that she had accepted a Ukrainian passport in keeping with her new official position. And finally the delicious detail emerged that she has written to the Russian authorities asking to be relieved of her Russian citizenship.

A defection in the full sense of the word!

In the past week, some further red meat was thrown to the chattering classes.  Another ‘princess,’ Ksenia Sobchak, daughter of Leningrad/St Petersburg’s first post-Communist freedom fighting mayor, Anatoly Sobchak, turned up on Ukrainian television, where she has accepted a star position with a channel financed by the local oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, another bête noire of the Kremlin. Kolomoisky is widely assumed to be financing the neo-fascist Pravy Sektor thugs who have been wreaking havoc in the Donbass in a no-holds-barred war on the Russian-speaking population.   

Sobchak claims that the redirection of her career was in response to her being frozen out of Russian television, where she had been a very successful presenter before going into politics. When she was still enjoying the Moscow limelight, Sobchak was a socialite, a kind of Russian Paris Hilton. Then in December 2011 she came out on behalf of the ‘non-systemic opposition’ that emerged from protests over the Duma elections.   

It will be interesting to see how long Sobchak can continue her balancing act of Moscow residency and open work for the enemy in Kiev. Given the incarceration she narrowly escaped a couple of years ago over charges of acting as go-between, moving substantial sums of U.S. dollars to the seditious movement she embraced, it is not hard to imagine Sobchak’s choosing resettlement and a new identity in Ukraine over a prison term in Russia.

These cases serve as a reminder that ‘dashes’ or ‘leaps for freedom’ such as brought Kirov ballet dancer Rudolf Nureyev to the front page of U.S. newspapers back in 1961 have continued unabated in post-Communist Russia. The cases above have in common two elements:  politics and money.  More commonly, the real driver is just money. The usual escapees to London or Paris these days are business people who are merely staying one step ahead of Russian state prosecutors investigating embezzlement, false bankruptcies and other forms of theft. Such cases cropped up this summer as well when officers of the Skolkovo science and technology center and of Rosnano chose flight to the West over responding to charges of felonies in Moscow.

Very often what is blown up by Western media as ‘civilizational choices’ between Russia and the West in the context of current testy relations actually form part of a hoary tradition.  For those of us who studied Russian history and even dipped into its medieval past, the issue appeared full-blown already in the 16th century with the defection to Lithuania of a boyar in Ivan the Terrible’s retinue, Prince Andrei Kurbsky, who was disappointed at his own career setbacks in the tsar’s service.  Russia’s first ‘political émigré,’ entered our history courses as a polemicist in a series of letters exchanged with the tsar from his new military command in the Polish state.

At the time, Russian diplomacy was less mealy-mouthed than today.  The following denunciation of Kurbsky was given to the Russian ambassador for delivery in April 1581 at the court of Polish king Stefan Batory:

 “He [Kurbsky] became a traitor not because he was forced into it but of his own free will. While still in Muscovy he did not wish the state well but left his country for the enemy and fought against the Orthodox lands, and having become a traitor he wrote a rude letter to the Sovereign.”

These words bring us to another Opposition figure in today’s Russia, former Minister of Foreign Affairs under Boris Yeltsin, Andrei Kozyrev. In a moment I will address the question of whether Kozyrev has been wishing his country well going back to the years of his service in the cabinet.  First let us consider his latest of several ‘rude letters to the Sovereign.’

On 20 July, The New York Times published an op-ed essay by Kozyrev entitled “Russia’s Coming Regime Change.” In it Kozyrev used a sleight-of-hand that is commonplace among his fellow Russian freedom-fighters, describing a catastrophic eventuality that he formally distances himself from but actually is inciting day after day by his political activities, regime change.

I call this advocacy catastrophic, because under circumstances of the overwhelming popularity of the current Russian president, regime change can only occur by assassination or other violence perpetrated by a small group of conspirators likely in the pay of a foreign power.

In the best of circumstances and with greatest likelihood, regime change would bring to power someone from the Kremlin’s inner circle.  Regime change might spark civil disturbances and political instability generally. The outcome of the power struggle would be totally unforeseeable. And we are talking about a nuclear superpower, whose rulers literally can decide the fate of mankind.  Most of the obvious candidates to succeed to the presidency are far less experienced, far less prudent than the incumbent.

What is the justification for Kozyrev’s courting sedition?  His allegations include “15 years of authoritarian rule,” a “K.G.B.-style state security and propaganda apparatus” that “holds the general population in its custody.”  He tells us that “the nation is truly on its knees” economically because it is “hostage to the capricious price of oil and a gluttonous military-security complex.”

Obviously Kozyrev has not taken note of what $50/barrel of oil has done to the highly advanced Western economy of Norway. Nor has he noted that the 4.5% of GDP which Russia spends on its military is roughly the same percentage as the USA spends.

I remind readers that in the year leading up to his removal from office, Kozyrev suffered a mental breakdown which was widely commented upon at the time.  His observations on today’s Russia in his op-ed in the New York Times are once again delusional.

This was not a one-off appearance in the American media by Kozyrev.  Back in March, following the murder of Opposition leader Boris Nemtsov, Kozyrev was given the op-ed page of The Washington Post to sound off about the evils of his native country:  “The West has a duty to stand up for human rights in Russia.”

Here he cited the usual suspects from among his comrades in arms, the likes of eternal presidential hopeful Grigory Yavlinsky of Yabloko and radio host Yulia Latynina (Ekho Moskvy) in their wholly irresponsible statements putting the murder at Vladimir Putin’s door.  Kozyrev presents Russia as violent and aggressive. While careful to say that the West “cannot and should not interfere in Russian domestic affairs,” he is calling on the West to stand up to Russia, to pursue a hard line and to view his country through his eyes, as a threat to the peace. If this is not what we used to call in US politics ‘giving comfort to the enemy’ and playing up to the John McCain’s of the American political establishment, then what is?  Is this pandering to outside powers the behavior of someone who genuinely wishes his native country well?

At the time of his removal from office, Andrei Kozyrev had become an embarrassment even to his American handlers at the U.S. State Department because of his volatility and unpredictability, notwithstanding his accommodating response to most every U.S. demand on Russian foreign policy orientation.  Nonetheless, his replacement by Yevgeny Primakov, who was made of sterner stuff, was regretted in Washington because it spelled the end of America’s one-way bet on a supine Russia.

With the passage of time, the inconvenient peculiarities of Kozyrev have been forgotten in the United States and he is remembered as a valued member of the group of Liberals headed by Yegor Gaidar whom Yeltsin brought into the cabinet.  Kozyrev’s English language entry in Wikipedia takes this line, telling us that Kozyrev “was viewed by many as one of the most important voices for liberalism and democracy in post-communist Russia.”  Presumably those “many” are folks living within the Beltway.

It is interesting that the Russian language entry for Kozyrev tells a different story, highlighting the serious questions Russians have had about his patriotism and common sense. In what is otherwise a very sketchy outline of his career in the Ministry, the commentators considered it relevant to point out that Kozyrev was called  “Mr. Da” by one and all in contrast to his long-serving Soviet predecessor, Andrei Gromyko, known as “Mr. Nyet.”  His was the “yes” to every American initiative in his pursuit of acceptance of Russia as an ally.  The conclusion of this analysis in Russian Wikipedia carries the essentials of the controversy surrounding Kozyrev in his homeland: “…notwithstanding all the efforts of Kozyrev, who was accused by his opponents of betraying the national interests, Russia did not become part of the Western world.”

Andrei Kozyrev is not a heroic figure. The fact that this modern day Kurbsky has not felt the need to move out, to defect in the full sense, gives the lie to his attacks on Vladimir Putin for running a police state.

© Gilbert Doctorow, 2015


G. Doctorow is an occasional guest lecturer at St. Petersburg State University and Research Fellow of the American University in Moscow. His latest book, Stepping Out of Line: Collected (Nonconformist) Essays on Russian-American Relations, 2008-12, is available in paperback and e-book from Amazon.com and affiliated websites worldwide.

All statements in this report are an opinion of the author. Act at your own risk. Russia & America Goodwill Association (RAGA) is not responsible for the content of the article. Any views or opinions presented in this report are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RAGA. Any liability in respect to this communication remain with the author.

RAGA News
www.RAGA.org

0 Comments

Chip Hodgkins: Russia is in the wrong, America is also in the wrong. The fix is new dialog. A Summit. Fast!  

8/25/2015

0 Comments

 
PictureChip Hodgkins
How could this have possibly happened?  The world’s two superpowers faced each other down for years in the Cold War, and then this brinksmanship suddenly ended in 1989.  These powerhouse nations had the chance to change the world together for the better.  In fact, in many ways they are more suited to be natural allies than potential enemies.  Yet today it looks as if they are ready to resume a second Cold War or, even worse, a hot war over the Ukraine.  Many don’t see the danger! The focus of the populace and the politicians is on ISIS, Donald Trump, and a possible Iranian nuclear peace deal, which the neo-cons in the U.S. Congress—not surprisingly—are already fighting.  What we need to focus on, and fast, are the missed opportunities that have slipped past since 1989.

Russia has made some serious mistakes due to Vladimir Putin. He has failed his mentor Boris Yeltsin in many ways.  In an interview conducted by Mike Wallace of 60 Minutes in the early 2000’s, Wallace questioned Yeltsin on the brutally harsh way the Russian press treated him.  Yeltsin shook it off. He said it was an essential part of a free Russia, and assured Wallace his successor would continue that essential freedom. Well, that has not happened.  Indeed, in recent years, Putin has cracked down on the freedom of the press in the same way that he has traditionally cracked down on any political opposition that dares challenge him: with ruthless efficiency.  In order to garner popular support at home, he has paired such domestic clampdowns with foreign adventurism, taking back parts of Georgia and the Ukraine, while also intimidating the Baltic States and Finland.  Such flexing of Russian muscles has left Western Europe, NATO and the United States uneasy, to say the least.

Although Putin is clearly in the wrong on multiple fronts, the United States has done a great job of pushing him in that direction.  At the end of the Cold War, U.S. foreign policy under the direction of Reagan, Shultz, Bush 41 and James Baker made verbal assurances that American would not extend NATO towards Russia’s borders and would attempt to oversee a peaceful transition in the region.  Russia took that as a sign of the beginning of a new world order and the foundation for a peaceful Russian transition from communism to a more liberal and capitalistic system.  Yet that did not happen. Why?

For starters, the beginnings of what we now term neo-con foreign policy were developing in the Bush 41 circles.  Why else wasn’t there a Marshall Plan for Russia, to help its transition to a stable market economy? The U.S. under Bush 41—and to a lesser extent under Clinton—began thinking it might be better for the U.S. to be the world’s sole superpower, or in other words a hegemonic global force.  This was accelerated under the disastrous takeover of foreign policy by the neo-cons in the Bush 43 administration. Not only was Russia not helped economically but NATO began a major expansion eastwards.  One could make a strong case for Poland being made a member due to its betrayal during World War II, but the list ends there.  While most U.S. citizens likely saw this eastward encroachment by NATO as an altruistic attempt to improve the daily lives of those living in Eastern Europe, the neo-cons knew, at heart, what it really was—old fashioned power politics, pure and simple.

American neo-cons weren’t satisfied in being the first among equals; they wanted domination.  Didn’t they know a nation that has constantly been invaded throughout its history would react badly? Invasions by Mongols, Tartars, Turks, and more recently Napoleon and Hitler has taught Russia that they should have a buffer zone to deter would-be invaders. Any American politician who denies that history and criticizes Putin on this issue should face reality. Boris Yeltsin would also have reacted negatively and defensively to these U.S. moves.  Even the most liberal-minded and anti-Soviet thinker and leader, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, considered a Russian sphere of influence over the Ukraine, Belorussia and parts of Kazakhstan as essential to Russian security. That the neo-cons have dragged U.S. foreign policy so far to the right is truly scary.

U.S. and NATO troops are now in the Ukraine training elements of the Ukrainian Army and National Guard. These troops, and the government that leads them, are far from perfect in their own right. The real bottom line, however, is that U.S. foreign policy has to stop looking at this situation as being about “democracy and freedom”;  rather, we need to practice “realistic” foreign policy with Ukraine and Russian, just as we practice it with a country like Saudi Arabia.  Saudi Arabia is a reactionary monarchy and morally despicable in many ways, yet they have been our closest Arab ally in the Middle East since the Reagan administration.  This is how the U.S. needs to look at Russia.

Russia and America are in many ways natural allies, unlike the United States and Saudi Arabia.  We are both ethnic melting pots, predominantly Christian, and we have both had major issues with Muslim extremists in the last twenty years. Look at the major foreign policy strides we have made together over the last few years.  Syria will be free of chemical weapons and Iran will be halted in development of a nuclear weapon. Not so bad.  Each of us needs to take a deep breath, step back and set up a modern summit so we can truly try to understand one another.  Maybe we can resolve our differences and get back on the path we left in the mid-1990’s. It is never too late and we owe it to humanity.  Neo-cons and their aggressive, bellicose thinking need to be swept once and for all into the dustbin of failure.  At the same time, Putin, who purportedly enjoys his massive ill-gotten wealth while ruling with the kind of iron fist not seen since the Soviet era, needs to wake up and change his ways, or another Boris Yeltsin will come along and do it for him.  What is the date for a Russian and American summit? Please make it soon.


© Chip Hodgkins


Chip Hodgkins is a graduate of Boston University's College of Communications with a B.S. in Print Journalism with emphasis on Foreign/War Coverage. He is especially proud of a paper he wrote  "NATO vs the Warsaw Pact" from his Soviet Military Policy class. He is currently President and C.O.O of WBRK-AM/FM radio stations in Pittsfield Ma. He was a member of the Rotary Club of Pittsfield for 15 years. He has won the statewide Presidents Award from Gun Owners Action League. He has been a board member of the Massachusetts Broadcasters Association. In 2010 he was sworn in as a Berkshire County Deputy Sheriff under Sheriff Carmen Massimiano. He is currently a member of the Board of Directors of the Hillcrest Educational Centers. He has covered and interviewed many famous national and international political figures. In addition to others including actors and famous sports figures.

All statements in this report are an opinion of the author. Act at your own risk. Russia & America Goodwill Association (RAGA) is not responsible for the content of the article. Any views or opinions presented in this report are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RAGA. Any liability in respect to this communication remain with the author.


RAGA News
www.RAGA.org

0 Comments

Please welcome Chip Hodgkins, a US-Russia Military History Expert and RAGA's Newest Team Member!

8/25/2015

0 Comments

 
PictureChip Hodgkins
Chip Hodgkins is a graduate of Boston University's College of Communications with a B.S. in Print Journalism with emphasis on Foreign/War Coverage. He is especially proud of a paper he wrote  "NATO vs the Warsaw Pact" from his Soviet Military Policy class. He is currently President and C.O.O of WBRK-AM/FM radio stations in Pittsfield Ma. He was a member of the Rotary Club of Pittsfield for 15 years. He has won the statewide Presidents Award from Gun Owners Action League. He has been a board member of the Massachusetts Broadcasters Association. In 2010 he was sworn in as a Berkshire County Deputy Sheriff under Sheriff Carmen Massimiano. He is currently a member of the Board of Directors of the Hillcrest Educational Centers. He has covered and interviewed many famous national and international political figures. In addition to others including actors and famous sports figures.

RAGA News
www.RAGA.org


0 Comments
    RAGA РАГА

    RAGANEWS

    Strengthening ties between Russia
    and America

    Picture
    Picture
    Follow us on Twitter

    Subscribe to RAGA Antiwar Newsletter

    * indicates required

    RAGA's BOOKS
    Picture
    ORDER on AMAZON
    Picture
    ORDER on LABIRINT
    Picture
    ORDER on RAGA
    Picture
    ORDER on RAGA

    Categories

    All
    Analytical Articles
    Anna Tolstoyevskaya
    Art
    Belarus
    Business
    Charles Bausman
    Chip Hodgkins
    Crimea
    Culture
    Dmitry Tamoikin
    Dr. Leo Semashko
    Dr. S. Sniegoski
    Economy
    Edward Lozansky
    EU
    G. Doctorow Ph.D.
    Great Britain
    G. Tarpley Ph.D.
    History
    J. J. Mearsheimer
    Kevin Barrett
    Martin Sieff
    Mass Media
    Michael Brenner
    NATO
    Newsletter
    Patrick Armstrong
    Press Release
    Prof. James Petras
    Putin
    RAGA
    Ramsey Clark
    Raymond Zwarich
    Religion
    Robert Parry
    Ron Unz
    Russia
    Russia Insider
    Security
    Shout Out UK
    Solzhenitsyn
    Stephen Cohen
    Trump
    Ukraine
    US
    USSR
    Videos
    V. Krasnov Ph.D

    Archives

    March 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    September 2020
    April 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    May 2008
    June 2001
    March 1999
    December 1998

    RSS Feed

Picture
Founder:
Vladislav Krasnov
(aka: W. George Krasnow)
RAGA РАГА
© RAGA.org
2003-2020
All Rights Reserved